Developmental Outcome in Infants with Cardiovascular Disease After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Pilot Study

• Published in: Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings Vol. 26; no. 4; pp. 575 - 583
• Main Authors: Ferentzi, Hannah, Pfitzer, Constanze, Rosenthal, Lisa-Maria, Berger, Felix, Schmitt, Katharina R. L., Kramer, Peter
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.12.2019; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Age; Babies; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Cardiovascular disease; Caregivers; Children & youth; Cognition & reasoning; CPR; Families & family life; Family Medicine; General Practice; Health Psychology; Heart surgery; Hospitals; Hypoxia; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Motor ability; Parents & parenting; Pediatrics; Questionnaires; Congenital heart disease; Bayley Scales of Infant Development; Developmental assessment; Neurological outcome; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
• ISSN: 1068-9583; 1573-3572
• DOI: 10.1007/s10880-019-09613-7

Unfavorable neurological outcome in children after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infancy is frequent. However, few studies have investigated the development of these patients using comprehensive developmental tests and the feasibility of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 3rd Edition (BSID-III) has not been reported for this population. In this cross-sectional pilot study, we assessed the cognitive, language, and motor development in infants after cardiopulmonary resuscitation of ≥ 5 min with the BSID-III at the age of 12 or 24 months, depending on recruitment age. For analysis, 11 patients with in-hospital ( n  = 8) and out-of-hospital ( n  = 3) cardiac arrest were included. BSID-III results could not be quantified in three patients because of visual/hearing and/or motor impairment. In patients with quantifiable scores, 50.0% scored average in composite BSID-III scores, while the other 50.0% showed developmental delays, scoring distinctly below average. We conclude that the BSID-III is feasible for developmental assessment in the majority of the study population, but the use of instruments suitable for hearing/visually impaired and/or severely disabled infants is crucial to avoid biased results. Accurate characterization of developmental deficits is important to facilitate early identification and therapy of deficits.