Custom TKA enables adequate realignment with minimal ligament release and grants satisfactory outcomes in knees that had prior osteotomies or extra-articular fracture sequelae

Purpose To report the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of custom total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in knees that had prior osteotomies and/or extra-articular fracture sequelae. Methods The authors retrospectively analysed a consecutive series of 444 knees that received custom TKA between 2016 an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA Vol. 31; no. 4; pp. 1212 - 1219
Main Authors Daxhelet, Jeremy, Aït-Si-Selmi, Tarik, Müller, Jacobus H., Saffarini, Mo, Ratano, Salvatore, Bondoux, Louka, Mihov, Kalin, Bonnin, Michel P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.04.2023
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To report the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of custom total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in knees that had prior osteotomies and/or extra-articular fracture sequelae. Methods The authors retrospectively analysed a consecutive series of 444 knees that received custom TKA between 2016 and 2019 and identified 41 knees that had prior extra-articular events (osteotomies or fracture sequelae). Patients responded to pre- and post-operative (> 12 months) questionnaires, including Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Net improvements were calculated by subtracting pre- from post-operative scores. In addition to a preoperative CT scan, pre- and post-operative long-leg weight-bearing radiographs were obtained, on which the hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, femoral mechanical angle (FMA, between femoral mechanical axis and joint line) and tibial mechanical angle (TMA, between tibial mechanical axis and joint line) angles were measured, and alignment was planned within a ‘target zone’ of FMA and TMA within 85°–95° and HKA angle within 175°–183°. Agreements between preoperative, planned and post-operative angles were calculated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Results From the initial 41 knees, 3 had incomplete post-operative data and 1 was revised for painful stiffness due to uncorrected rotational malunion, leaving 37 knees for analysis. Twenty had prior osteotomies (tibia, n  = 18, femur, n  = 2), 8 had isolated fractures (tibial, n  = 3; femoral, n  = 5), and 9 had both osteotomies and fractures. Postoperative coronal alignments were 90.4° ± 2.4° for FMA, 89.3° ± 2.6° for TMA and 179.9° ± 3.0° for HKA angle. Agreements between planned and achieved alignments were fair to excellent, and 29 (78%) knees were within the ‘target zone’. At a mean follow-up of 15 ± 5 months, all clinical scores had improved significantly ( p  < 0.001). Conclusions Custom TKA granted satisfactory clinical outcomes and a low complication rate in knees that had prior osteotomies and/or extra-articular fracture sequelae. Using custom implants and strategies for coronal alignment, 29 (78%) of the 37 knees were successfully aligned within the ‘target zone’, and 35 (95%) of the 41 knees did not require ligament release. Level of evidence IV.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0942-2056
1433-7347
DOI:10.1007/s00167-021-06619-3