Soil quality response to cover crops and amendments in a vineyard in Nova Scotia, Canada

• Published in: Scientia horticulturae Vol. 188; pp. 6 - 14
• Main Authors: Messiga, Aime J., Sharifi, Mehdi, Hammermeister, Andrew, Gallant, Kyle, Fuller, Keith, Tango, Martin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 04.06.2015
• Subjects: Cover crops; Municipal solid food waste; Mussel shell; Organic C; Wine grape; Wood ash; Cover crops; Organic C; Municipal solid food waste; Wine grape; Wood ash; Mussel shell
• ISSN: 0304-4238; 1879-1018
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.02.041

•Cover crops×organic-industrial wastes were assessed on soil quality in a vineyard.•Legume-based cover crops maintained high soil mineral N during the growing season.•Organic-industrial wastes sustained higher soil pH and Mehlich-3 P than fertilizers.•Cover crops×organic-industrial wastes increased soil organic C and total N.•Cover crops×synthetic fertilizer had the lowest influence on SOC and SON. The effects of cover crop mixtures combined with organic and industrial wastes on selected soil properties were assessed in a vineyard in Eastern Canada. The experimental treatments were randomly arranged in a nested design with three replicates. Four alleyway cover crop mixtures [control with no cover crop (CONT), oats+pea+hairy vetch (OPV), oats underseeded with red clover (ORCl), and timothy+alsike+red clover (TM)] were applied to main plots. Five fertility treatments [fertilizer without N (NDEF), full synthetic fertilizer (FERT), wood ash (WA), municipal solid food waste (MSFW), and mussel sediment (MS)] were assigned to sub-plots. Changes in selected soil quality (0–15cm) were assessed at the beginning of the growing season (May 9, 2011 and April 28, 2012), at bloom in early-July (July 06, 2011 and 2012), and at harvest in late-October (October 31, 2011 and October 20, 2012). At bloom, soil mineral N was 23.56kgha−1 for OPV and 20.68kgha−1 for ORCl, but only 16.38kgha−1 for CONT and 12.53kgha−1 for TM. At harvest, soil mineral N was 21.95kgha−1 for ORCl, but only 15.43kgha−1 for OPV and TM and 9.10kgha−1 for CONT. Soil mineral N was mainly in the form of NO3−–N until bloom, but at harvest majority of soil mineral N was consisted of NH4+–N. After one year of experiment, the three organic and industrial amendments maintained greater soil pH (7.34 for MSFW and 7.35 for WA) and Mehlich-3 extractable P (399kgPM3ha−1 for MSFW and 333kgPM3ha−1 for WA) compared with FERT (pH 7.17; 306kgPM3ha−1) and NDEF (pH 7.12; 288kgPM3ha−1) treatments. After two years of experiment, the combination of cover crop×amendment improved soil organic-C by 8.8% and 10.6% and -N by 8.1% and 9.8% compared with amendment alone and cover crop×FERT treatment, respectively. Potentially mineralizable N estimated by UV-absorbance of NaHCO3 extraction was greater under ORCl (0.79 abs) compared with the other cover crops (0.69 abs). The microbial biomass C was 205kgha−1 under MSFW and 212kgha−1 under WA, but only 168kgha−1 under NDEF, 125kgha−1 under FERT. The combination of cover crops and organic or industrial wastes provide comparable soil mineral N supply and available P with fertilized treatments while improving soil physical and biological properties and overall soil quality in this vineyard production system.