Euclidean distances of laryngopharyngeal structures obtained from CT data for preclinical development of laryngoscopic devices

Purpose This study aims to determine Euclidean distances between landmark structures in the larynx and pharynx to optimize endoscope shaft designs with regard to gentle and patient-oriented handling. Methods Four Euclidean distances between landmarks in the larynx and pharynx were analyzed based on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSurgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.) Vol. 42; no. 6; pp. 695 - 700
Main Authors Diers, Daniela, Fast, Jacob Friedemann, Götz, Friedrich, Kahrs, Lüder Alexander, Miller, Simone, Jungheim, Michael, Ptok, Martin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Paris Springer Paris 01.06.2020
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose This study aims to determine Euclidean distances between landmark structures in the larynx and pharynx to optimize endoscope shaft designs with regard to gentle and patient-oriented handling. Methods Four Euclidean distances between landmarks in the larynx and pharynx were analyzed based on CT data of 66 patients. Distance (1): labium inferius oris—posterior pharyngeal wall at the cervical vertebra C1 (atlas), anterior edge of the tuberculum anterius atlantis. Distance (2): posterior pharyngeal wall adjacent to C1—entrance of pyriform sinus. Distance (3): inferior edge of the uvula—superior edge of the epiglottis. Distance (4): base of the vallecula—posterior pharyngeal wall. The minimum angular field of view α required to observe the glottis with a rigid transoral laryngoscope was derived trigonometrically from distances (2) and (4). Results Average Euclidean distances measured: Distance (1): 90.7 mm ± 6.9 mm in men and 86.9 mm ± 5.9 mm in women. (2): 73.7 mm ± 13.4 mm and 56.2 mm ± 7.6 mm. (3): 25.2 mm ± 8.6 mm and 18.5 mm ± 6.8 mm. (4): 20.8 mm ± 4.6 mm and 16.5 mm ± 3.4 mm. α : 16.0° ± 3.9° and 16.6 ± 4.3°. Conclusions As expected, statistically significant sex-related differences could be observed for distances (1)–(4). The results indicate that the length of transoral laryngoscopes should not be below 110 mm and that a minimum angular field of view of α  = 17° is required to fully observe the laryngeal inlet.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0930-1038
1279-8517
DOI:10.1007/s00276-019-02397-3