Using AI Tools in Writing Peer Review Reports: Should Academic Journals Embrace the Use of ChatGPT?

This letter highlights a pressing issue regarding the absence of established editorial policies for the utilization of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT) in the peer review process. The increasing adoption of AI tools in academic publishing necessitates the formulation of standardized guidelines to ensure fai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of biomedical engineering Vol. 52; no. 2; pp. 139 - 140
Main Author Garcia, Manuel B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 01.02.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Biochemistry
Biological and Medical Physics
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering
Biomedical Research
Biomedicine
Biophysics
Chatbots
Classical Mechanics
Letter to the Editor
Peer Review
Periodicals as Topic
Policies
Publishing
Reviews
Writing
Peer review
ChatGPT
Artificial intelligence
Editorial policies
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This letter highlights a pressing issue regarding the absence of established editorial policies for the utilization of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT) in the peer review process. The increasing adoption of AI tools in academic publishing necessitates the formulation of standardized guidelines to ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability. Without clear editorial policies, there is a threat of compromising the integrity of the peer review process and undermining the credibility of academic publications. Urgent attention is needed to address this gap and establish robust protocols that govern the use of AI tools in peer review.
Bibliography:content type line 23
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
ISSN:0090-6964
1573-9686
1573-9686
DOI:10.1007/s10439-023-03299-7