Dietary interventions for pediatric patients with functional abdominal pain disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

• Published in: European journal of pediatrics Vol. 182; no. 7; pp. 2943 - 2956
• Main Authors: Hua, Can, Chen, Yi-Lin, Tao, Qing-Feng, Shi, Yun-Zhou, Li, Li-Wen, Xie, Chao-Rong, Chen, Min, Zhou, Zi-Li, Zheng, Hui
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.07.2023; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Abdomen; Clinical trials; Dietary supplements; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Meta-analysis; Nutrition therapy; Pain; Patients; Pediatrics; Placebos; Probiotics; Review; Systematic review; Abdominal pain; Pediatrics; Systematic review; Diet therapy; Meta-analysis
• ISSN: 1432-1076; 0340-6199; 1432-1076
• DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-04979-1

Dietary therapies are recommended for the treatment of pediatrics with functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs), but the comparative effectiveness among them is unclear. Therefore, the main aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of differential dietary therapies in pediatrics with functional abdominal pain disorders. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception to February 28, 2023. Randomized clinical trials of dietary treatments for pediatric patients with functional abdominal pain disorders were included. The primary outcome was the improvement in abdominal pain. The secondary outcomes were changes in pain intensity and pain frequency. Thirty-one studies after screening 8695 retrieved articles were included, and 29 studies were available for network meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, fiber (RR, 4.86; 95%CI, 1.77 to 13.32; P -score = 0.84), synbiotics (RR, 3.92; 95%CI, 1.65 to 9.28; P -score = 0.75), and probiotics (RR, 2.18; 95%CI, 1.46 to 3.26; P-score = 0.46) had significantly larger effect on the improvement in abdominal pain, the three treatments had larger effect than placebo but statistically insignificant in difference in improving pain frequency and intensity. Similarly, there were no significant differences between the dietary treatments after indirect comparisons of the three outcomes.   Conclusion : Fiber supplements, synbiotics, and probiotics were efficacious in improving abdominal pain of FAPDs in children, suggested by very low or low evidence. The evidence of the efficacy of probiotics is more convincing than fiber and synbiotics when sample size and statistical power were considered. No difference in the efficacy of the three treatments. High-quality trials are needed to further investigate the efficacy of dietary interventions. What is Known: • Multiple dietary treatment options are available for functional abdominal pain disorders in the pediatric population, of which the most beneficial one is currently unknown. What is New: • This NMA found very low to low certainty of the evidence suggesting that fiber, synbiotics, and probiotics might be more efficacious in improving abdominal pain of FAPDs in children than the other dietary treatments. • There were no significant differences between active dietary treatments for changes in abdominal pain intensity.