Incidence of clinically significant perforation at low dose non-contrast CT and its value prior to same day CT colonography following incomplete colonoscopy

Purpose Routine low dose non-contrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis has been suggested prior to same day completion CT colonography (CTC) to assess for occult perforation at preceding incomplete colonoscopy, before further gaseous insufflation at CTC. The aim of our study is to examine the incidence...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAbdominal imaging Vol. 45; no. 4; pp. 1044 - 1048
Main Authors O’Shea, Aileen, Murray, Timothy, Morrin, Martina M., Lee, Michael J., Thornton, Eavan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.04.2020
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose Routine low dose non-contrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis has been suggested prior to same day completion CT colonography (CTC) to assess for occult perforation at preceding incomplete colonoscopy, before further gaseous insufflation at CTC. The aim of our study is to examine the incidence of clinically significant perforation at low dose CT. We also examine the benefits of low dose pre-scan in assessing adequacy of bowel preparation and identifying any other relevant contraindications to CT colonography. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective review of all low dose non-contrast CTs performed following failed colonoscopies over a 4-year period ( n  = 392). We also assessed the adequacy of bowel preparation on a scale of 1–5, in order of increasingly adequate preparation. Incidentally noted bowel pathology and contraindications to CT colonography were also recorded. Results No perforation was identified either prospectively or in the course of our retrospective review. However, 15 patients (3.8%) were found to have potential contraindications to CT colonography, including: acute diverticulitis, acute colitis, and poor bowel preparation. Overall, the bowel preparation was felt to be adequate (≥ 3) in 86% percent of patients. Two patients (0.5%) identified prospectively had their CT colonography postponed due to poor bowel preparation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2366-004X
2366-0058
DOI:10.1007/s00261-019-02062-8