A Review of Forensic Fellowship Training: Similar Challenges, Diverse Approaches

• Published in: Academic psychiatry Vol. 44; no. 2; pp. 149 - 154
• Main Authors: Michaelsen, Katherine, Piel, Jennifer, Kopelovich, Sarah, Reynolds, Susan, Cowley, Deborah
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.04.2020; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Administrative support; Collaboration; Communication Skills; Competence; Consultation Programs; Cooperative Learning; Correctional treatment programs; Courts; Curricula; Didacticism; Directors; Educational Experience; Fellowships; Forensic psychiatry; Forensic psychology; Full Time Equivalency; Funding; Graduate Medical Education; Hospitals; In Brief Report; Interviews; Juvenile Justice; Law schools; Medical Education; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Meetings; Occupational Information; Persuasive Discourse; Polls & surveys; Productivity; Psychiatrists; Psychiatry; Research Directors; Resistance (Psychology); Supervision; Supervisors; Teaching; Teaching Methods; Time on Task; Trainees; Training; United States > US; California; Psychiatry fellowship; Forensic education; Forensic psychiatry training; State hospital
• ISSN: 1042-9670; 1545-7230
• DOI: 10.1007/s40596-019-01083-1

Objective As the specialty of forensic psychiatry and the numbers of justice involved individuals with mental illness continue to grow, forensic education is receiving more attention. To add to this discussion, the authors reviewed current training practices in forensic psychiatry fellowship programs. Methods As part of a project funded by the state legislature looking at psychiatry and psychology training, with special focus on state hospital partnerships, the authors interviewed and surveyed forensic psychiatry fellowship program directors and conducted site visits to select programs. Given the mandate, special attention was given to programs with state hospital and psychology training affiliations. Results The literature and fellowship directors identified several key features and challenges for forensic training programs. Forensic fellowships focused primarily on evaluations and consultations but differed in their offerings related to training in treatment, scholarship, and particular types of evaluations. Common concerns included maintaining adequate funding, variety of training experiences, adequate faculty time, and adequate institutional support. Directors described cultivating institutional support by demonstrating mutual benefit as particularly important for securing resources. Conclusion Forensic fellowships operational during the 2016-2017 academic year offered a range of forensic training activities, but experienced common challenges such as inadequate funding and faculty supervision. Empirical studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between programmatic offerings, the noted challenges, and acquired competencies.