Phase II study of Dovitinib in recurrent glioblastoma
Introduction Dovitinib is an oral, potent inhibitor of FGFR and VEGFR, and can be a promising strategy in patients with recurrent or progressive glioblastoma (GBM). Methods This was an open label phase II study of two arms: Arm 1 included anti-angiogenic naïve patients with recurrent GBM and Arm 2 i...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of neuro-oncology Vol. 144; no. 2; pp. 359 - 368 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.09.2019
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Introduction
Dovitinib
is an oral, potent inhibitor of FGFR and VEGFR, and can be a promising strategy in patients with recurrent or progressive glioblastoma (GBM).
Methods
This was an open label phase II study of two arms: Arm 1 included anti-angiogenic naïve patients with recurrent GBM and Arm 2 included patients with recurrent GBM that had progressed on prior anti-angiogenic therapy. Nineteen subjects were enrolled in Arm 1 and 14 subjects in Arm 2. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6) in Arm 1 and time to progression (TTP) in Arm 2. The secondary endpoints were toxicity, objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival.
Results
Patients in Arm 2 (compared to Arm 1) tended to have longer intervals from diagnosis to study entry (median 26.9 vs. 8.9 months, p = 0.002), experienced more recurrences (64%, had 3–4 prior recurrences compared to 0, p < 0.0001) and tended to be heavily pretreated (71% vs. 26–32% p = 0.04 or 0.02). 6-month PFS was 12% ± 6% for the Arm 1 and 0% for Arm 2. TTP was similar in both treatment arms (median 1.8 months Arm 1 and 0.7–1.8 months Arm 2, p = 0.36). Five patients (15%) had grade 4 toxicities and 22 patients (67%) had grade 3 toxicities. There were no significant differences between the two arms with respect to the amount of change in the levels of biomarkers from baseline.
Conclusion
Dovitinib was not efficacious in prolonging the PFS in patients with recurrent GBM irrespective of prior treatment with anti-angiogenic therapy (including bevacizumab). |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0167-594X 1573-7373 1573-7373 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11060-019-03236-6 |