Sex estimation in the cranium and mandible: a multislice computed tomography (MSCT) study using anthropometric and geometric morphometry methods

• Published in: International journal of legal medicine Vol. 134; no. 2; pp. 823 - 832
• Main Authors: Gillet, Claudia, Costa-Mendes, Leonor, Rérolle, Camille, Telmon, Norbert, Maret, Delphine, Savall, Frédéric
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.03.2020; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Accuracy; Age; Anthropometry; Biomedical materials; Body measurements; Classification; Computed tomography; Cranium; Forensic anthropology; Forensic Medicine; Forensic sciences; Geometric accuracy; Medical Law; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Model accuracy; Original Article; Regression analysis; Sex; Skull; Statistical analysis; Geometric morphometry; Skull; Forensic anthropology; Mandible; Forensic science; Sex estimation
• ISSN: 0937-9827; 1437-1596
• DOI: 10.1007/s00414-019-02203-0

Introduction The purpose of this study was to analyze the respective contribution of the skull and mandible to sex estimation in an entire cranium using metric and geometric morphometric methods and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) analysis. Materials The study sample comprised 120 individuals aged 23 to 84 years and divided into three groups (whole sample and over or under 40 years of age). Methods Forty-eight osteometric landmarks were positioned using Osirix®, 34 for the cranium and 14 for the mandible. The data were analyzed using univariate analyses and logistic regression using backward stepwise selection with cross-validation of the classification results. Generalized procrustes analysis (GPA) was used, and Goodall’s F test and Mahalanobis D 2 matrices allowed an assessment of statistical significance. Results The classification accuracy of cranium models ranged from 87% to 88.3%, and from 68% to 81.4% for the mandibular models. With geometric morphometry, accuracy was of 94–100% for the cranium and 84.2% for the mandible. Discussion We conclude that the mandible had a higher accuracy rate for individuals over 40 years than individuals under 40 years of age, although the accuracy of geometric morphometry did not differ significantly between the age groups. The cranium, however, presented greater predictability for all the parameters assessed.