A Qualitative Study to Understand the Impact of Caring for Traumatic Injury Survivors

Following traumatic injury, an informal carer is often required to support recovery. Understanding the impact of caregiving is important to inform intervention design. to explore the impact of caring on family and caregiver finances, employment, social life, and psychological wellbeing. Semi-structu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of environmental research and public health Vol. 19; no. 23; p. 16202
Main Authors Hudson, Catherine, Radford, Kate, Kettlewell, Jade
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 03.12.2022
MDPI
Subjects
Aftercare
Brain injury
Caregivers
Caregivers - psychology
Employment
Health care
Health services
Humans
Injury analysis
Injury prevention
Older people
Patient Discharge
Professional services
Psychological factors
Psychology
Qualitative Research
Social support
Survival
Survivors
United Kingdom > UK
United States > US
carer burden
traumatic injuries
informal carers
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Following traumatic injury, an informal carer is often required to support recovery. Understanding the impact of caregiving is important to inform intervention design. to explore the impact of caring on family and caregiver finances, employment, social life, and psychological wellbeing. Semi-structured interviews conducted with carers of traumatic injury survivors. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed, informed by the Roy Adaptation Model (RAM) and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Ten participants were interviewed. Key themes included (1) financial impact/employment issues, (2) relationships and support and (3) psychological impact. Most carers did not receive professional support with daily care post-discharge. Carers' employers responded positively, supporting them even after extensive leave. Carers received inconsistent communication whilst visiting trauma survivors in hospital; carers with healthcare experience were favoured. Navigating and receiving benefits was complex. Some carers found it difficult to accept the trauma survivor's injury, whilst others focused on achieving goals. Support from professional services is limited outside hospital settings for non-brain injuries. Future interventions and healthcare services should acknowledge the lack of psychological support for carers. Researchers should consider using the ICF/RAM when designing interventions to ensure the full impact on carers is addressed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
DOI:10.3390/ijerph192316202