Hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release versus open: propensity-matched analysis of 30-day outcomes

Purpose To examine the hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30 day outcomes of hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release (hrTAR) compared with open transversus abdominis release (oTAR). Methods Patients receiving hrTAR were selected from the AHSQC database and propensity matched with a contemporary...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery Vol. 25; no. 6; pp. 1491 - 1497
Main Authors Abdu, R., Vasyluk, A., Reddy, N., Huang, L.-C., Halka, J. T., DeMare, A., Janczyk, R., Iacco, A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Paris Springer Paris 01.12.2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To examine the hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30 day outcomes of hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release (hrTAR) compared with open transversus abdominis release (oTAR). Methods Patients receiving hrTAR were selected from the AHSQC database and propensity matched with a contemporary cohort of oTAR patients. Results The cohort included 95 hrTAR and 285 oTAR patients. There was a significantly shorter median LOS in the hrTAR cohort (3 vs. 5 days, p  < 0.001). The rate of surgical site occurrences in the hrTAR cohort was also lower than for oTAR (5% vs. 15%, p  = 0.015). Readmission rates were not different between hrTAR and oTAR (6% vs. 8%, p  = 0.65). Conclusion hrTAR demonstrates improved LOS compared to oTAR as well as fewer surgical site related occurrences. Further studies are needed to investigate the etiology behind the improved LOS and to confirm appropriate long-term outcomes from hybrid robotic TAR.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1265-4906
1248-9204
DOI:10.1007/s10029-020-02249-9