Mometasone furoate in the treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus: could its formulation influence efficacy, tolerability and adherence to treatment?

To assess the effectiveness, tolerability, and convenience of the cream formulation of mometasone furoate 0.1% (MMF) in the treatment of active vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) and to compare the cream with the ointment formulation. The following efficacy parameters were assessed in 27 VLS patients tre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of dermatological treatment Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 305 - 309
Main Authors Corazza, Monica, Virgili, Annarosa, Toni, Giulia, Borghi, Alessandro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis Group 01.05.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To assess the effectiveness, tolerability, and convenience of the cream formulation of mometasone furoate 0.1% (MMF) in the treatment of active vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) and to compare the cream with the ointment formulation. The following efficacy parameters were assessed in 27 VLS patients treated with MMF cream for 12 weeks (group A): (i) response rate, (ii) percentage of patients achieving an improvement from baseline of ≥75% in subjective and objective scores, and (iii) mean reduction in subjective and objective scores. These efficacy assessments, as well as those regarding safety and adherence, were compared with the assessments recorded among 37 VLS patients treated with MMF ointment (group B). 59.3% (group A) and 78.4% (group B) of patients were considered responders; 44.4% and 40.7% of patients in group A and 54.1% and 45.9% in group B achieved an improvement of at least 75% in subjective and objective scores, respectively. MMF ointment obtained a significantly higher improvement in symptom scores in comparison with the cream formulation. MMF in ointment formulation seems to be more effective in treating active VLS in comparison with MMF cream. Both formulations are well tolerated and there is no difference in patient adherence and satisfaction.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0954-6634
1471-1753
DOI:10.1080/09546634.2017.1360990