Buried versus unburied Kirschner wires in the management of paediatric lateral condyle elbow fractures: a comparative study from a tertiary centre

There is little consensus on whether Kirschner wire (K-wire) burial is preferable in the management of paediatric lateral humeral condyle fractures. We identified 124 patients from May 2008 to August 2014. Sixty received buried K-wires and 64 received unburied wires. We found no significant differen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of pediatric orthopaedics. B Vol. 25; no. 1; p. 69
Main Authors Ormsby, Neal M, Walton, Roger D M, Robinson, Simon, Brookes-Fazakerly, Stephen, Chang, Fernando Yuen, McGonagle, Lorcan, Wright, David
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.01.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is little consensus on whether Kirschner wire (K-wire) burial is preferable in the management of paediatric lateral humeral condyle fractures. We identified 124 patients from May 2008 to August 2014. Sixty received buried K-wires and 64 received unburied wires. We found no significant difference in the infection rates between groups, but a high rate of skin erosion (23%) in the buried group, with a subsequent high rate of infection in this subgroup (40%). We found a strong association of wire erosion following early surgery. There is a considerable cost saving associated with using unburied wires. We therefore recommend the routine use of unburied wires.
ISSN:1473-5865
DOI:10.1097/BPB.0000000000000226