A critical appraisal of the relative contribution of tissue architecture, genetics, epigenetics and cell metabolism to carcinogenesis

Here we contrast several carcinogenesis models. The somatic-mutation-theory posits mutations as main causes of malignancy. However, inconsistencies led to alternative explanations. For example, the tissue-organization-field-theory considers disrupted tissue-architecture as main cause. Both models ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProgress in biophysics and molecular biology Vol. 182; pp. 26 - 33
Main Authors Grunt, Thomas W., Heller, Gerwin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Here we contrast several carcinogenesis models. The somatic-mutation-theory posits mutations as main causes of malignancy. However, inconsistencies led to alternative explanations. For example, the tissue-organization-field-theory considers disrupted tissue-architecture as main cause. Both models can be reconciled using systems-biology-approaches, according to which tumors hover in states of self-organized criticality between order and chaos, are emergent results of multiple deviations and are subject to general laws of nature: inevitable variation(mutation) explainable by increased entropy(second-law-of-thermodynamics) or indeterminate decoherence upon measurement of superposed quantum systems(quantum mechanics), followed by Darwinian-selection. Genomic expression is regulated by epigenetics. Both systems cooperate. So cancer is neither just a mutational nor an epigenetic problem. Rather, epigenetics links environmental cues to endogenous genetics engendering a regulatory machinery that encompasses specific cancer-metabolic-networks. Interestingly, mutations occur at all levels of this machinery (oncogenes/tumor-suppressors, epigenetic-modifiers, structure-genes, metabolic-genes). Therefore, in most cases, DNA mutations may be the initial and crucial cancer-promoting triggers.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0079-6107
1873-1732
1873-1732
DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2023.05.004