Chronic wrist pain: spin-echo and short tau inversion recovery MR imaging and conventional and MR arthrography

The accuracy of T1-, proton-density-, and T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences and gadolinium-enhanced MR arthrography in evaluation of the triangular fibro-cartilage complex (TFCC) and the scapholunate (SL) and lunotriquetral (LT) ligaments was studied in 15 patients with chronic w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRadiology Vol. 182; no. 1; p. 205
Main Authors Schweitzer, M E, Brahme, S K, Hodler, J, Hanker, G J, Lynch, T P, Flannigan, B D, Godzik, C A, Resnick, D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.01.1992
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The accuracy of T1-, proton-density-, and T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences and gadolinium-enhanced MR arthrography in evaluation of the triangular fibro-cartilage complex (TFCC) and the scapholunate (SL) and lunotriquetral (LT) ligaments was studied in 15 patients with chronic wrist pain. Arthrography and arthroscopy were used as standards of reference. Twelve patients also underwent imaging with short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences. MR imaging was more reliable in evaluation of the morphology of the TFCC and SL ligament than in that of the LT ligament. With arthrography as the standard, sensitivity was 0.721, specificity was 0.947, and accuracy was 0.887 for the TFCC; these values were 0.500, 0.864, and 0.765 for the SL ligament and 0.519, 0.455, and 0.490 for the LT ligament. No visualization of the SL ligament indicated a tear, but this sign was not helpful in evaluation of the LT ligament. Fluid in the distal radioulnar joint had a high association with TFCC tears. Accuracy with MR arthrography was higher than with the other sequences. STIR images were effective in evaluation of the TFCC. The combination of proton-density-and T2-weighted images appears to be useful because morphologic characteristics and the presence of fluid can be evaluated.
ISSN:0033-8419
DOI:10.1148/radiology.182.1.1727283