Using dynamic model averaging in state space representation with dynamic Occam’s window and applications to the stock and gold market

We combine the Onorante and Raftery (2016) dynamic Occam’s window approach with the Raftery et al. (2010) DMA/DMS estimator in state space representation to create forecasts using a data-rich forecasting environment. Our approach is mainly related to economic and financial time series that are subje...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of empirical finance Vol. 44; pp. 158 - 176
Main Authors Risse, Marian, Ohl, Ludwig
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.12.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0927-5398
1879-1727
DOI10.1016/j.jempfin.2017.09.005

Cover

More Information
Summary:We combine the Onorante and Raftery (2016) dynamic Occam’s window approach with the Raftery et al. (2010) DMA/DMS estimator in state space representation to create forecasts using a data-rich forecasting environment. Our approach is mainly related to economic and financial time series that are subject to periods of high volatility, which increases the necessity of a time varying parameter framework. In a forecasting exercise for the stock and gold markets, we highlight the economic value-added of our approach by applying a simple trading rule to the return series. By combining both assets, we show that our approach performs better when compared to alternative forecasting models such as machine learning algorithms and standard DMA/DMS. Results for the complexity of the forecasting models highlight the advantages of high dimensional forecasting approaches in times of economic uncertainty, such as the recent financial crisis. The economic performance of the trading rule weakens when we consider transaction costs. •We combine the Onorante and Raftery (2016) dynamic Occam’s window approach with the Raftery et al. (2010) DMA estimator.•The approach accounts for model and parameter uncertainty by using a large database.•We find superior performance compared to various alternative forecasting models when considering a combined investment strategy.
ISSN:0927-5398
1879-1727
DOI:10.1016/j.jempfin.2017.09.005