Epitaxial growth of celestite on barite (0 0 1) face at a molecular scale

In situ AFM experiments have been conducted in order to obtain information about kinetics of celestite epitaxial growth on barite. Growth has been promoted by passing aqueous solutions supersaturated with respect to celestite over freshly cleaved barite (0 0 1) surfaces. Solution supersaturation, β...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSurface science Vol. 581; no. 2; pp. 225 - 235
Main Authors Sánchez-Pastor, Nuria, Pina, Carlos M., Astilleros, José Manuel, Fernández-Díaz, Lurdes, Putnis, Andrew
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Lausanne Elsevier B.V 01.05.2005
Amsterdam Elsevier Science
New York, NY
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In situ AFM experiments have been conducted in order to obtain information about kinetics of celestite epitaxial growth on barite. Growth has been promoted by passing aqueous solutions supersaturated with respect to celestite over freshly cleaved barite (0 0 1) surfaces. Solution supersaturation, β celestite, was varied from 1 to 45.7 ( β celestite = a ( Sr 2 + ) · a ( SO 4 2 - ) / K sp , cel ) . At supersaturations below 10 neither two-dimensional nucleation neither step advancement are observed on barite (0 0 1) surfaces. However, once the two-dimensional nucleation barrier is overcome ( β celestite > 10), nuclei preferentially form on cleavage steps parallel to [1 0 0], [1 1 0] and [1 2 0] directions and more scarcely on terraces. The subsequent growth of two-dimensional nuclei leads to the development of celestite “islands”. Their morphology is defined by (0 0 1) face and {2 1 0} and {1 0 0} forms and can be explained on the basis of PBC theory. The coalescence of such islands results in the formation of a homogeneous SrSO 4 layer. Growth rates along [0 0 1] direction have been measured for the whole supersaturation range. The growth rate equation for “Birth and Spread” crystal growth mechanism has been successfully fitted to our experimental data. The fitting process has provided basic growth parameters in a good agreement with theoretical ones. Both the high transitional supersaturation required for two-dimensional nucleation and the high interfacial energy value obtained from the fitting of the “Birth and Spread” equation ( σ 001 cel – bar = 0.137 J / m 2 ) indicate low affinity of SrSO 4 growth units for barite (0 0 1) faces. This is consistent with the relative high mismatch between celestite and barite structure. The behaviour of the epitaxial growth described in this work can help to interpret the oscillatory zoning frequently occurring in both natural and synthetic crystals of the Ba x Sr 1− x SO 4 solid solution.
ISSN:0039-6028
1879-2758
DOI:10.1016/j.susc.2005.02.051