Strengths of composite bonded to base metal alloy using dentin bonding systems

• Published in: The Journal of prosthetic dentistry Vol. 84; no. 2; pp. 149 - 153
• Main Authors: Knight, James S., Sneed, W.Dan, Wilson, Michael C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Mosby, Inc 01.08.2000
• Subjects: Analysis of Variance; Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry; Chromium Alloys - chemistry; Composite Resins - chemistry; Dental Bonding; Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry; Dentistry; Materials Testing; Methacrylates - chemistry; Phosphates - chemistry; Polymethacrylic Acids - chemistry; Resin Cements - chemistry; Tensile Strength
• ISSN: 0022-3913; 1097-6841
• DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2000.107917

Statement of Problem: Many different bonding systems are currently available that may be used to bond composite to base metal alloy. Purpose: This study measured and compared bond strengths of composite with a base metal alloy using 8 modern dentin bonding systems. Material and Methods: Base metal alloy buttons were imbedded in acrylic and ground with 120, 400, and 600 grit sandpaper, respectively. Metal surfaces were air abraded for 5 seconds with 50 μm aluminum oxide, washed for 5 seconds under running tap water, then dried with compressed air. Specimens were arbitrarily divided into 8 groups of 10 specimens. Each group was treated with 1 of 8 dentin bonding regimens. A hybrid composite (Herculite) was placed onto the treated metal surface and light polymerized. Specimens were incubated at 37°C in distilled water for 2 hours. Shear bond strengths were measured and the collected data subjected to an ANOVA, followed by multiple t -tests. Results: All-Bond 2 exhibited the highest mean shear bond strength and Panavia 21 with primer had the lowest in the tests conducted. Conclusion: All-Bond 2 demonstrated significantly higher shear bond strengths over all materials tested, except 3M Single Bond and Optibond FL. No significant difference was noted between the single component and the multicomponent bonding systems. (J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:149-53.)