An evaluation of risk methods for prioritizing fire protection features: a procedure for fire barrier penetration seals

This paper generally evaluates risk methods available for prioritizing fire protection features. Risk methods involving both the use of qualitative insights, and quantitative results from a fire probabilistic risk analysis are reviewed. The applicability of these methods to develop a prioritized lis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNuclear engineering and design Vol. 232; no. 2; pp. 165 - 171
Main Author Dey, M.K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.08.2004
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper generally evaluates risk methods available for prioritizing fire protection features. Risk methods involving both the use of qualitative insights, and quantitative results from a fire probabilistic risk analysis are reviewed. The applicability of these methods to develop a prioritized list of fire barrier penetration seals in a plant based on risk significance is presented as a procedure to illustrate the benefits of the methods. The paper concludes that current fire risk assessment methods can be confidently used to prioritize plant fire protection features, specifically fire barrier penetration seals. Simple prioritization schemes, using qualitative assessments and insights from fire PRA methodology may be implemented without the need for quantitative results. More elaborate prioritization schemes that allow further refinements to the categorization process may be implemented using the quantitative results of the screening processes in good fire PRAs. The use of the quantitative results from good fire PRAs provide several benefits for risk prioritization of fire protection features at plants, mainly from the plant systems analyses conducted for a fire PRA.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0029-5493
1872-759X
DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2003.11.035