The Feasibility of Percutaneous Transradial Coronary Intervention for Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions and Comparison with Transfemoral Route

Background: Transradial PCI is rapidly expanding and is effective in complex lesion subset due to miniaturization of devices and accumulated clinical experience. However, the femoral route still remains the usual vascular route used for SVG PCI in most catheterization laboratories. Methods: We exami...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of interventional cardiology Vol. 22; no. 4; pp. 336 - 340
Main Authors RATHORE, SUDHIR, ROBERTS, ELVED, HAKEEM, ABDUL R., PAURIAH, MAHESHWAR, BEAUMONT, ANDREW, MORRIS, JOHN L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.08.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Transradial PCI is rapidly expanding and is effective in complex lesion subset due to miniaturization of devices and accumulated clinical experience. However, the femoral route still remains the usual vascular route used for SVG PCI in most catheterization laboratories. Methods: We examined 115 consecutive patients undergoing SVG PCI between January 2003 and December 2005 and compared the radial (51 patients) and femoral (64 patients) approaches. Results: Baseline demographics, lesion location, and clinical indication were similar in both groups. GpIIbIIIa inhibitor usage was high in the radial group (78.4% vs. 53.1%, P < 0.01). Angiographic success was similar in both groups, 96% in the radial group vs. 96.8 in the femoral. Total fluoroscopy time (18.59 ± 12.23 vs. 20.45 ± 12.9), total procedure time (52.1 ± 29.5 vs. 43.90 ± 23.31 min), and the use of total contrast volume (357.0 ± 174.0 vs. 346.0 ± 157.0 ml) were similar in the radial and femoral groups, respectively. In‐hospital MACE (radial: 2 MI [4.0%] vs. femoral: 1 death [1.6%] and 7 MI [11.0%], P < 0.01) were similar in both groups. Access site vascular complications (radial: 2 [4.0%] vs. femoral: 10 [11.0%], P < 0.001) were significantly less in the radial group. Conclusions: The transradial approach for SVG PCI is feasible, safe, and as quick as the femoral approach. Procedural success is high with similar radiation and contrast exposure. In‐hospital MI in the femoral group is high because of more‐unstable patients. However, there are significantly lower vascular complications despite high use of platelet inhibitors in the radial approach.
Bibliography:istex:CD476D4E3B40F607B700CAE78E5F75BA37DD3931
ArticleID:JOIC479
ark:/67375/WNG-HSCCBVQC-S
ISSN:0896-4327
1540-8183
DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8183.2009.00479.x