Incidence of sore throat in children following use of flexible laryngeal mask airways - impact of an introducer device

Summary Background:  Insertion of a flexible laryngeal mask airway (FLMA) is more difficult and therefore might result in a higher risk for trauma to the upper airway. To facilitate the insertion of FLMA, the use of an introducer device (Portex Limited, Hythe, Kent, UK) was promoted. However, the im...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPediatric anesthesia Vol. 20; no. 9; pp. 839 - 843
Main Authors WILLIAM, ANTHEA, CHAMBERS, NEIL A., ERB, THOMAS O., Von UNGERN-STERNBERG, BRITTA S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Background:  Insertion of a flexible laryngeal mask airway (FLMA) is more difficult and therefore might result in a higher risk for trauma to the upper airway. To facilitate the insertion of FLMA, the use of an introducer device (Portex Limited, Hythe, Kent, UK) was promoted. However, the impact of the use of this device on the occurrence of postoperative sore throat is unknown. Methods:  Four hundred children (3–21 years) undergoing elective ambulatory surgery were consecutively included in this study. In 196 cases, the FLMA was inserted using an introducer device. The FLMA cuff was then inflated and the pressure adjusted to below 60 cmH2O (according to manufacturers guidelines) using a calibrated cuff manometer (Portex Limited). Three types of FLMA were available: FLMA classic, FLMA unique (both FLMA PacMed, Richmond, Victoria, Australia) and FLMA ProBreathe (Well Lead Medical Co Ltd., Hualong, Guangzhou, China). Prior to discharge, patients’ pain was assessed using an age appropriate scale. Results:  Thirteen children (3.3%) developed sore throat, two (0.5%) sore neck and three (0.75%) sore jaw. Of those that developed sore throat, seven had a FLMA inserted with an introducer, six without an introducer. Using a laryngeal mask airways (LMA) with a polyvinyl chloride (PVC), surface was associated with a higher risk for sore throat compared with an LMA with a silicone surface (P = 0.0002). Conclusion:  In this study with controlled low cuff pressures, the incidence of sore throat was low. The use of an introducer device did not affect the rate of sore throat.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-8B42B9M7-9
istex:99E43D7B5B6A8AC016937F97ECC21E541B64A1BF
ArticleID:PAN3372
ISSN:1155-5645
1460-9592
DOI:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03372.x