The gas–liquid contacting effect on the operation of small scale upflow hydrotreaters
The effect of reactor geometry and bed dilution on the extent of gas oil hydrodesulfurization was tested by conducting hydrodesulfurization experiments in two laboratory reactors of different scale with non-diluted and diluted beds in ascending flow. The superficial gas and liquid velocities and the...
Saved in:
Published in | Catalysis today Vol. 127; no. 1; pp. 103 - 112 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
30.09.2007
Elsevier Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The effect of reactor geometry and bed dilution on the extent of gas oil hydrodesulfurization was tested by conducting hydrodesulfurization experiments in two laboratory reactors of different scale with non-diluted and diluted beds in ascending flow. The superficial gas and liquid velocities and the catalyst bed height were kept constant while the main difference between the two reactor scales was the reactor diameter. The diluted bed of the mini-reactor showed the best performance and its results were identical in upflow and downflow mode. The differences between the performance of the mini- and the bench-scale reactor operating in upflow mode have been investigated. Reactor performance simulation was attempted by a mathematical model that takes into account axial dispersion of the liquid phase and gas–liquid mass transfer. Bench-scale reactor operation was characterized by lower mass transfer rates than the corresponding mini-scale one. Combining model predictions and mock up operation it is concluded that the stronger mass transfer resistances calculated for the bench-scale reactor are associated with poorer gas distribution through the catalyst bed. Reduction of the bed diameter results in better gas–liquid contact by forcing the gas bubbles to distribute more effectively into the liquid phase. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0920-5861 1873-4308 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.05.004 |