Clinicopathological differences, risk factors and prognostic scores for western patients with intestinal and diffuse-type gastric cancer

BACKGROUNDIn the molecular era, the Laurén system is still a cost-effective and widely implemented classification for gastric cancer (GC) and it has been recently associated with clinical, histological and molecular features of these tumors. Despite recent advances in the understanding of the molecu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology Vol. 14; no. 6; pp. 1162 - 1174
Main Authors Díaz del Arco, Cristina, Estrada Muñoz, Lourdes, Ortega Medina, Luis, Molina Roldán, Elena, Cerón Nieto, M. Ángeles, García Gómez de las Heras, Soledad, Fernández Aceñero, M. Jesús
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 15.06.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUNDIn the molecular era, the Laurén system is still a cost-effective and widely implemented classification for gastric cancer (GC) and it has been recently associated with clinical, histological and molecular features of these tumors. Despite recent advances in the understanding of the molecular biology of GC, there is a need to develop new prognostic tools for patient stratification in clinical practice. Thus, the identification of easily available prognostic factors in patients with intestinal and diffuse-type tumors can significantly improve risk assessment and patient stratification in GC. AIMTo identify clinicopathological differences, risk factors, and to develop cost-effective prognostic scores for patients with intestinal and diffuse-type GC. METHODSRetrospective study of all patients undergoing surgery for GC at a tertiary referral center from 2001 to 2019. 286 cases met inclusion criteria (intestinal: 190, diffuse: 96). Clinical data and gross findings were collected. All specimens were reviewed by two independent pathologists and a detailed protocol for histologic evaluation was followed. Five tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed and sections of the TMA block were immunostained for HERCEPTEST, MSH2, MSH6, MLH1 and PMS2. Statistical analyses were performed and prognostic scores were developed based on hazard ratios. RESULTSIntestinal and diffuse-type GC showed different epidemiological, clinicopathological and prognostic features. Diffuse tumors were significantly associated with younger age, less symptomatology, flat morphology, deeper invasion, perineural infiltration, advanced stage at diagnosis, administration of adjuvant therapy and poorer prognosis. Intestinal lesions were fungoid or polypoid, showed necrosis, desmoplasia, microsatellite instability and HERCEPTEST positivity and were diagnosed at earlier stages. Tumor depth, desmoplasia, macroscopic type and lymph node involvement were independently related to the Laurén subtype. Furthermore, intestinal and diffuse GC were associated with different risk factors for progression and death. Vascular invasion, perineural infiltration and growth pattern were important prognostic factors in intestinal-type GC. On the contrary, tumor size and necrosis were significant prognosticators in diffuse-type GC. Our recurrence and cancer-specific death scores for patients with intestinal and diffuse-type GC showed an excellent patient stratification into three (diffuse GC) or four (intestinal) prognostic groups. CONCLUSIONOur findings support that Laurén subtypes represent different clinicopathological and biological entities. The development of specific prognostic scores is a useful and cost-effective strategy to improve risk assessment in GC.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Corresponding author: Cristina Díaz del Arco, MD, Staff Physician, Associate Professor, Department of Surgical Pathology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, c/ Profesor Martín Lagos s/n, Madrid 28040, Spain. crisdelarco@gmail.com
Author contributions: Díaz del Arco C participated in the data acquisition, analysis, interpretation, manuscript draft, approval and agreement; Estrada Muñoz L participated in the data acquisition, analysis, manuscript revision, approval and agreement; Ortega Medina L participated in the study design, data interpretation, manuscript revision, approval and agreement; Molina Roldán E, Cerón Nieto MA, García Gómez de las Heras S participated in the data acquisition, manuscript revision, approval and agreement; Fernández Aceñero MJ participated in the study design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript draft, approval and agreement.
ISSN:1948-5204
1948-5204
DOI:10.4251/wjgo.v14.i6.1162