Fit for purpose? Fitting ontological security studies ‘into’ the discipline of International Relations Towards a vernacular turn

• Published in: Cooperation and conflict Vol. 52; no. 1; pp. 12 - 30
• Main Authors: Croft, Stuart, Vaughan-Williams, Nick
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England Sage Publications, Ltd 01.03.2017; SAGE Publications; Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: Boundaries; International relations; Narratives; Police; Scholarship; Security; Social sciences; International Relations; ontological security; Dread; everyday security; vernacular security
• ISSN: 0010-8367; 1460-3691
• DOI: 10.1177/0010836716653159

The performance of International Relations (IR) scholarship–as in all scholarship–acts to close and police the boundaries of the discipline in ways that reflect power–knowledge relations. This has led to the development of two strands of work in ontological security studies in IR, which divide on questions of ontological choice and the nature of the deployment of the concept of dread. Neither strand is intellectually superior to the other and both are internally heterogeneous. That there are two strands, however, is the product of the performance of IR scholarship, and the two strands themselves perform distinct roles. One allows ontological security studies to engage with the ‘mainstream’in IR; the other allows ‘international’elements of ontological security to engage with the social sciences more generally. Ironically, both can be read as symptoms of the discipline’s issues with its own ontological (in) security. We reflect on these intellectual dynamics and their implications and prompt a new departure by connecting ontological security studies in IR with the emerging interdisciplinary fields of the ‘vernacular’and ‘everyday’via the mutual interest in biographical narratives of the self and the work that they do politically.