The Sensitivity of Ultra-Widefield Fundus Photography Versus Scleral Depressed Examination for Detection of Retinal Horseshoe Tears

• Published in: American journal of ophthalmology Vol. 255; pp. 155 - 160
• Main Authors: Lin, Andrew C., Kalaw, Fritz Gerald P., Schönbach, Etienne M., Song, Delu, Koretz, Zachary, Walker, Evan, Breazzano, Mark P., Scott, Nathan L., Borooah, Shyamanga, Ferreyra, Henry, Spencer, Doran B., Goldbaum, Michael H., Nudleman, Eric D., Freeman, William R., Toomey, Christopher B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Inc 01.11.2023
• ISSN: 0002-9394; 1879-1891
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.07.010

Ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging is commonly used in ophthalmology in tandem with scleral depressed examinations (SDE) to evaluate peripheral retinal disease. Because of the increased reliance on this technology in tele-ophthalmology, it is critical to evaluate its efficacy for detecting the peripheral retina when performed in isolation. Therefore, we sought to evaluate UWF imaging sensitivity in detecting retinal horseshoe tears (HSTs). Retrospective clinical validity and reliability study. A single-institutional retrospective analysis was performed on patients at the Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego. Patients with HSTs seen on SDE who underwent treatment with laser were included in the study. A total of 140 patients with HSTs in the right and/or left eyes met the inclusion criteria. Those with concomitant ruptured globes, retinal detachments, and vitreous hemorrhages were excluded. A total of 123 patients with 135 HSTs were included in the final analysis. The primary outcome was the number of HSTs detected by UWF imaging. A secondary outcome was HST location. Sensitivity was measured with respect to HST location, and statistical significance was calculated by Fisher exact testing. A total of 69 (51.1%) HSTs were visualized on UWF images and 66 (48.9%) were not visualized. The sensitivity of UWF imaging in capturing HSTs was 7 of 41 (17.1%), 8 of 25 (32.0%), 7 of 14 (50.0%), and 47 of 55 (85.5%) for the superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal quadrants, respectively. Sensitivities between HST visibility and location were statistically significant (P < .001). Nearly half of HSTs were missed by UWF imaging. This study demonstrates that UWF imaging alone is not sufficiently sensitive to exclude the presence of HSTs.