Comparative benefits and harms of individual opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials

Most systematic reviews of opioids for chronic pain have pooled treatment effects across individual opioids under the assumption they provide similar benefits and harms. We examined the comparative effects of individual opioids for chronic non-cancer pain through a network meta-analysis of randomise...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of anaesthesia : BJA Vol. 129; no. 3; pp. 394 - 406
Main Authors Noori, Atefeh, Sadeghirad, Behnam, Wang, Li, Siemieniuk, Reed A.C., Shokoohi, Mostafa, Kum, Elena, Jeddi, Mark, Montoya, Luis, Hong, Patrick J., Zhou, Edward, Couban, Rachel J., Juurlink, David N., Thabane, Lehana, Bhandari, Mohit, Guyatt, Gordon H., Busse, Jason W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Most systematic reviews of opioids for chronic pain have pooled treatment effects across individual opioids under the assumption they provide similar benefits and harms. We examined the comparative effects of individual opioids for chronic non-cancer pain through a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to March 2021 for studies that enrolled patients with chronic non-cancer pain, randomised them to receive different opioids, or opioids vs placebo, and followed them for at least 4 weeks. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. We identified 82 eligible trials (22 619 participants) that evaluated 14 opioids. Compared with placebo, several opioids showed superiority to others for analgesia and improvement in physical function; however, when restricted to pooled-effect estimates supported by moderate certainty evidence, no differences between opioids were evident. Among opioids with moderate certainty evidence, all increased the risk of gastrointestinal adverse events compared with placebo, although no opioids were more harmful than others. Low to very low certainty evidence suggests that extended-release vs immediate-release opioids may provide similar benefits for pain relief and physical functioning, and gastrointestinal harms. Our findings support the pooling of effect estimates across different types and formulations of opioids to inform effectiveness for chronic non-cancer pain.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ISSN:0007-0912
1471-6771
DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.031