Effects of collagen peptide supplementation on cardiovascular markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled trials

Previous studies have advocated that collagen peptide supplementation (CPS) can positively affect cardiovascular health. However, the widespread impact of CPS on CVD-related markers is not fully resolved. Consequently, the current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of nutrition Vol. 129; no. 5; pp. 779 - 794
Main Authors Jalili, Zahra, Jalili, Faramarz, Moradi, Sajjad, Bagheri, Reza, Moosavian, Seyedeh Parisa, Naeini, Fatemeh, Mohammadi, Hamed, Mojtaba Ghoreishy, Seyed, Wong, Alexei, Travica, Nikolaj, Hojjati Kermani, Mohammad Ali, Jalili, Cyrus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 14.03.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Previous studies have advocated that collagen peptide supplementation (CPS) can positively affect cardiovascular health. However, the widespread impact of CPS on CVD-related markers is not fully resolved. Consequently, the current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of CPS on CVD-related markers. A systematic search in the Scopus, PubMed and ISI Web of Science databases were completed to identify relevant randomised, placebo-controlled trials (RCT) published up to November 2021. Mean Differences were pooled using a random-effects model, while publication bias, sensitivity analyses and heterogeneity were assessed using previously validated methods. Twelve RCT, comprising of a total of eleven measured markers, were selected for the quantitative analysis. Pooled data revealed that CPS significantly decreased fat mass (–1·21 kg; 95 % CI: −2·13, −0·29; I2 = 0·0 %; P = 0·010) and increased fat-free mass, based on body mass percentage (1·49 %; 95 % CI: 0·57, 2·42; I2 = 0·0 %; P = 0·002). Moreover, collagen peptide supplementation led to a significant decrease in serum LDL (–4·09 mg/dl; 95 % CI: −8·13, −0·04; I2 = 93·4 %; P = 0·048) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) (–5·04 mmHg; 95 % CI: −9·22, −0·85; I2 = 98·9 %; P = 0·018). Our analysis also indicated that CPS did not affect glycemic markers. Our outcomes indicate that CPS reduces fat mass, LDL and SBP while increasing fat-free mass. Future investigations with longer CPS duration are needed to expand on our results.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ISSN:0007-1145
1475-2662
DOI:10.1017/S0007114522001301