Good vs. Poor Self-rated Diabetes Control: Differences in Cardiovascular Risk and Self-care Activities
Abstract Aim: The aim of this study was to assess differences in cardiovascular risk and performance of self-care activities in people who rated their diabetes control as good or poor. Methods: A sub-sample of 77 participants who took part in the Evaluation of Diabetes Treatment telephone interview...
Saved in:
Published in | Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes Vol. 226; no. 4; pp. 236 - 239 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Stuttgart · New York
J. A. Barth Verlag in Georg Thieme Verlag KG
01.04.2014
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract
Aim:
The aim of this study was to assess differences in cardiovascular risk and performance of self-care activities in people who rated their diabetes control as good or poor.
Methods:
A sub-sample of 77 participants who took part in the Evaluation of Diabetes Treatment telephone interview were invited into a clinic to complete a series of laboratory examinations. Self-rated diabetes control was validated using the following laboratory markers: HbA1c, total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio and LDL cholesterol. Differences in blood pressure and BMI were also assessed. Finally, all participants also completed the Summary of Self-Care activities questionnaire.
Results:
Those people who rated their diabetes control as fair or poor had a significantly higher BMI, HbA1c levels, total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio and systolic blood pressure. When asked about self-care activities in the past week, those people who reported their diabetes control was fair/poor had spent significantly fewer days following a general diet and exercising.
Conclusions:
People with poor self-rated diabetes control have unfavourable cardiovascular risk and decreased performance of self-care activities. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0947-7349 1439-3646 |
DOI: | 10.1055/s-0034-1367005 |