5-Year haemodynamic performance of three aortic bioprostheses. A randomized clinical trial

• Published in: European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery Vol. 64; no. 2
• Main Authors: Montero Cruces, Lourdes, Carnero Alcázar, Manuel, Pérez Camargo, Daniel, Cobiella Carnicer, Javier, Campelos Fernández, Paula, Reguillo Lacruz, Fernando José, Maroto Castellanos, Luis Carlos
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01.08.2023
• ISSN: 1873-734X; 1873-734X
• DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad261

Abstract OBJECTIVES The Carpentier Perimount (CP) Magna Ease, the Crown Phospholipid Reduction Treatment (PRT) and the Trifecta bovine pericardial valves have been widely used worldwide. The primary end point of this study was to compare the haemodynamic performance quantified by in vivo echocardiograms of these 3 aortic prostheses. METHODS The “BEST-VALVE” (comparison of 3 contemporary cardiac bioprostheses: mid-term valve haemodynamic performance) was a single-centre randomized clinical trial to compare the haemodynamic and clinical outcomes of the aforementioned bioprostheses. The 5-year results are assessed in this manuscript. RESULTS A total of 154 patients were included. The CP Magna Ease (n = 48, 31.2%), Crown PRT (n = 51, 32.1%) and Trifecta (n = 55, 35.7%) valves were compared. Significant differences were observed among the 3 bioprostheses 5 years after the procedure. The following haemodynamic differences were found between the CP Magna Ease and the Crown PRT bioprostheses [mean aortic gradient: 12.3 mmHg (interquartile range {IQR} 7.8–17.5) for the CP Magna Ease vs 15 mmHg (IQR 10.8–31.9) for the Crown PRT, P < 0.001] and between the CP Magna Ease and the Trifecta prostheses [mean aortic gradient: 12.3 mmHg (IQR 7.8–17.5) for the CP Magna Ease vs 14.7 mmHg (IQR 8.2–55) for the Trifecta, P < 0.001], with a better haemodynamic performance of the CP Magna Ease. The cumulative incidence of severe structural valve degeneration was 9.5% in the Trifecta group at 6 years of follow-up. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival from all-cause mortality was 91.5%, 83.5% and 74.8%, respectively (log rank P = 0.440). Survival from the composite event at the 1-, 3- and 5-year follow-up was 92.8%, 74.6% and 59%, respectively (log rank P = 0.299). CONCLUSIONS We detected significant differences between the 3 bioprostheses; the CP Magna Ease had the best haemodynamic performance at the 5-year follow-up.