On the application of the rule of mixture to microhardness of complex polymer systems containing a soft component and/or phase
The main goal of this work is to find a reasonable explanation for the frequently reported drastic deviations from the “rule of mixture” applied for calculation of the overall microhardness, H, of complex polymer systems comprising a soft, (with a glass transition, Tg, or melting, Tm, temperatures b...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of materials science Vol. 42; no. 4; pp. 1131 - 1148 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Heidelberg
Springer
01.02.2007
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The main goal of this work is to find a reasonable explanation for the frequently reported drastic deviations from the “rule of mixture” applied for calculation of the overall microhardness, H, of complex polymer systems comprising a soft, (with a glass transition, Tg, or melting, Tm, temperatures below room temperature) component and/or phase. According to the common practice, the contribution to H of the soft component and/or phase, Hs, is considered as Hs = 0, which results in extremely large differences between the measured and calculated H values for systems comprising more than 20–25 wt% soft component and/or phase. For such systems a different deformation mechanism during indentation process is postulated, namely “floating” of the solid particles in the soft component and/or phase, in addition to their plastic deformation. The contribution of the “floating effect” to the overall H is accounted for by the empirically derived relationship H = 1.97 Tg−571. Using the reported data on H and Tg for homopolymers, blockcopolymers and blends, the H values are recalculated and a good agreement with the experimentally measured values is found. A modified additivity law is suggested, which contains a term accounting for the contribution of the soft component and/or phase to the overall microhardness via the relationship between H and Tg; its application results in much smaller differences between the measured and calculated H values. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0022-2461 1573-4803 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10853-006-1468-7 |