Using peer research processes to understand strategies to support those with severe, multiple and complex health needs

• Published in: Health education journal Vol. 78; no. 2; pp. 176 - 188
• Main Authors: Woodall, James, Cross, Ruth, Kinsella, Karina, Bunyan, Ann-Marie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.03.2019; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Alcohol Abuse; Chronic illnesses; Disability; Disadvantaged; Disease management; Diseases; Foreign Countries; Health Behavior; Health Needs; Health Personnel; Health Promotion; Health Services; Homeless People; Lay People; Mental Disorders; Needs analysis; Participatory Research; Pathogenesis; Peer Groups; Peers; Research methodology; Researchers; School Community Relationship; Self Concept; Snowball sampling; Social Isolation; Social Services; Social situations; Substance Abuse; Trust (Psychology); Urban Areas; United Kingdom; United Kingdom > UK; Complex needs; peer research; multiple disadvantage; health promotion; social exclusion; UK
• ISSN: 0017-8969; 1748-8176
• DOI: 10.1177/0017896918796044

Objectives: There has been an increased focus in policy discourse on individuals with severe, multiple and complex needs. This paper seeks to understand how best to enable these individuals to take greater control over their health. Design: Qualitative, user-led, peer research. Setting: Large urban UK city. Method: Trained peer researchers with previous experience in contexts of severe and multiple disadvantage gathered data using a snowball sampling approach from 21 individuals engaged in a service specifically designed to provide for their needs. Results: The study identified enabling factors that create conditions for individuals with severe and multiple disadvantage to take greater control of factors impacting on their health and social situations. These included working holistically with individuals, understanding the interconnected issues impacting on health, developing trusting relationships with professionals and working within a positive framework that fosters self-belief and which is focused on salutogenesis rather than pathogenesis. Conclusion: There exists a set of enabling factors that may support individuals facing particular challenges in their lives. While derived from within a specific geographical context, findings have relevance to other settings in relation to ways of working. Peer research demonstrates itself to be a research approach well suited to understanding lived experiences.