Flexural Behavior of Alkali-Activated Ultra-High-Performance Geopolymer Concrete Beams

• Published in: Buildings (Basel) Vol. 14; no. 3; p. 701
• Main Authors: Su, Jie, Tan, Jiandong, Li, Kai, Fang, Zhi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.03.2024
• Subjects: alkali-activated cement; beam; Carbon; Carbon footprint; Caustic soda; Cement; Concrete; Concrete mixing; Crack propagation; Design; Ductility; Ecological footprint; Energy consumption; Failure modes; flexural behavior; Geopolymers; Industrial plant emissions; Localization; Mechanical properties; Portland cement; Portland cements; Reinforcement; reinforcement ratio; Silica; Sodium; Steel; steel fiber content; Steel fibers; Stiffness; Strain gauges; Structural design; Structural engineering; Tensile strength; ultra-high-performance geopolymer concrete (UHPGC)
• ISSN: 2075-5309; 2075-5309
• DOI: 10.3390/buildings14030701

Ultra-high-performance geopolymer concrete (UHPGC) emerges as a sustainable and cost-effective alternative to Portland cement-based UHPC, offering similar mechanical properties while significantly reducing carbon footprint and energy consumption. Research on UHPGC components is extremely scarce. This study focuses on the flexural and crack behavior of UHPGC beams with different steel fiber contents and longitudinal reinforcement ratios. Five UHPGC beams were tested under four-point bending. The test results were evaluated in terms of the failure mode, load–deflection relationship, flexural capacity, ductility, average crack spacing, and short-term flexural stiffness. The results show that all the UHPGC beams failed due to crack localization. Increases in the reinforcement ratio and steel fiber content had favorable effects on the flexural capacity and flexural stiffness. When the reinforcement ratio increased from 1.18% to 2.32%, the flexural capacity and flexural stiffness increased by 60.5% and 12.3%, respectively. As the steel fiber content increased from 1.5% to 2.5%, the flexural capacity and flexural stiffness increased by 4.7% and 4.4%, respectively. Furthermore, the flexural capacity, flexural stiffness, and crack spacing of the UHPGC beams were evaluated using existing methods. The results indicate that the existing methods can effectively predict flexural capacity and flexural stiffness in UHPGC beams but overestimate crack spacing. This study will provide a reference for the structural design of UHPGC.