Strategic Integration of a Vegetative Component on a Metal Roof Base: An Evaluation of Its Impacts on Thermal and Acoustic Performance in the Tropics

• Published in: Buildings (Basel) Vol. 14; no. 4; p. 915
• Main Authors: Aw, Siew Bee, Leng, Pau Chung, Ling, Gabriel Hoh Teck, Wong, Keng Yinn, Mohamed Anuar, Mohamed Rohaizad, Mohd Rokhibi, Ismail Wajdi, Ng, Cheah Haur, Law, Nathan Hui Kai, Goh, Santa Ying Zi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.04.2024
• Subjects: Acoustic insulation; acoustic performance; Acoustic resonance; Acoustics; Ambient temperature; Business metrics; Climate; Cooling; Daylight; Energy consumption; green roof; Green roofs; Heat conductivity; insulation; metal roof; Metals; Modules; Rain; Rank tests; Reinforced concrete; Roofs; Simulation; Sound; Statistical analysis; Surface temperature; Temperature; thermal performance; tropical; Tropical climate; Tropical climates; Tropical environments; Wet days; Malaysia; Singapore
• ISSN: 2075-5309; 2075-5309
• DOI: 10.3390/buildings14040915

This paper attempts to ascertain the thermal and acoustic impacts of introducing a vegetative roof layer on insulated and uninsulated metal roofs for tropical climates, through field measurements in Skudai, Johor, Malaysia, that were conducted for both dry and wet days. Four small-scale roof modules were tested, namely an uninsulated metal roof (uiMDR), an insulated metal roof (iMDR), and two identical corresponding modules with an additional vegetative component (uiGR and iGR, respectively). Outdoor ambient temperature (Tamb) was the most influential correlated variable affecting the roof outer surface temperature (RTOS) in 50% of the assessed scenarios. On the selected dry day, the inter-quartile ranges (IQR) of iGR, iMDR, uiGR, and uiMDR were 6.21 °C, 8.32 °C, 6.69 °C, and 1.66 °C, respectively; the IQRs were 1.6 °C, 4.11 °C, 2.59 °C, and 1.78 °C, respectively, on the selected wet day. Based on design U-value calculations, iGR was better than iMDR and uiMDR for both dry and wet days. The U-value of uiGR was also better than iMDR under dry-day conditions. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test also indicated a statistically significant difference in the roof inner surface temperature (RTIS) measurements (p-value = 0.00) during Malaysian daylight hours, between 8.00 a.m. and 6.00 p.m., regardless of the weather. In terms of sound level reduction under dry-day conditions, the Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed statistically significant differences in sound level reductions, with iGR and uiGR performing better than iMDR and uiMDR (p-values = 0.00). The sound level reductions for iGR, iMDR, and uiGR were 51%, 32%, and 31%, respectively, while uiMDR experienced sound level amplifications by 6%, possibly due to the acoustic resonance effect. This proof of concept may encourage a broader application of extensive GRs in Malaysia using metal roofs, beyond the conventional RC base construction method.