Removal of the ballistocardiographic artifact from EEG–fMRI data: a canonical correlation approach

The simultaneous recording of electroencephalogram (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can give new insights into how the brain functions. However, the strong electromagnetic field of the MR scanner generates artifacts that obscure the EEG and diminish its readability. Among them,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysics in medicine & biology Vol. 54; no. 6; pp. 1673 - 1689
Main Authors Assecondi, Sara, Hallez, Hans, Staelens, Steven, Bianchi, Anna M, Huiskamp, Geertjan M, Lemahieu, Ignace
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England IOP Publishing 21.03.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0031-9155
1361-6560
DOI10.1088/0031-9155/54/6/018

Cover

More Information
Summary:The simultaneous recording of electroencephalogram (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can give new insights into how the brain functions. However, the strong electromagnetic field of the MR scanner generates artifacts that obscure the EEG and diminish its readability. Among them, the ballistocardiographic artifact (BCGa) that appears on the EEG is believed to be related to blood flow in scalp arteries leading to electrode movements. Average artifact subtraction (AAS) techniques, used to remove the BCGa, assume a deterministic nature of the artifact. This assumption may be too strong, considering the blood flow related nature of the phenomenon. In this work we propose a new method, based on canonical correlation analysis (CCA) and blind source separation (BSS) techniques, to reduce the BCGa from simultaneously recorded EEG-fMRI. We optimized the method to reduce the user's interaction to a minimum. When tested on six subjects, recorded in 1.5 T or 3 T, the average artifact extracted with BSS-CCA and AAS did not show significant differences, proving the absence of systematic errors. On the other hand, when compared on the basis of intra-subject variability, we found significant differences and better performance of the proposed method with respect to AAS. We demonstrated that our method deals with the intrinsic subject variability specific to the artifact that may cause averaging techniques to fail.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0031-9155
1361-6560
DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/54/6/018