Expression of E-cadherin, and CD44s and CD44v6 and its association with prognosis in head and neck cancer

Objectives: In the current study, the expression of E-cadherin, CD44s, and CD44v6 has been noted as markers for tumor metastasis and prognosis in several tumors, so we examined whether or not E-cadherin, CD44s, and CD44v6 are useful markers for evaluating the prognosis of mesopharyngeal cancer patie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAuris, nasus, larynx Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 35 - 41
Main Authors Kawano, Toshirou, Nakamura, Yoshiyasu, Yanoma, Shunsuke, Kubota, Akira, Furukawa, Madoka, Miyagi, Youhei, Tsukuda, Mamoru
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01.03.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives: In the current study, the expression of E-cadherin, CD44s, and CD44v6 has been noted as markers for tumor metastasis and prognosis in several tumors, so we examined whether or not E-cadherin, CD44s, and CD44v6 are useful markers for evaluating the prognosis of mesopharyngeal cancer patients. Methods: The expression of E-cadherin, CD44s, and CD44v6, was evaluated immunohistochemically using monoclonal antibodies against epitopes of standard and variant proteins, in paraffin-embedded mesopharyngeal cancer tissues from 57 patients who had received curative therapy. Results: Tumor tissues from 47 (82.5%) patients showed positive immunoreactivity with monoclonal antibody against E-cadherin, 43 (75.4%) patients showed positive expression with CD44, and 45 (78.9%) patients showed positive expression with CD44v6. The expression of CD44v6 was slightly correlated with tumor volume, and lymph node metastasis, and stage classification ( P>0.05). However, there was no significant correlation between the expression of E-cadherin, CD44s and CD44v6 and clinicopathological characteristics. Concerning the prognosis, the survival period of patients with CD44s positive tumors was shorter than that of patients with CD44s negative tumors (18.2% versus 52.1%, 5-year survival, P<0.05). The survival period of patients with CD44v6 positive tumors was also shorter than that of patients with CD44v6 negative tumors (12.8% versus 55.6%, 5-year survival, P<0.05). Conclusion: These results suggest that CD44v6 may be related to tumor invasion and metastasis, and both CD44s and CD44v6 may be useful markers for poor prognosis in head and neck cancer.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0385-8146
1879-1476
DOI:10.1016/j.anl.2003.09.005