α‐Glucosidase Inhibition by Usnic Acid Derivatives

This study investigated a set of new potential antidiabetes agents. Derivatives of usnic acid were designed and synthesized. These analogs and nineteen benzylidene analogs from a previous study were evaluated for enzyme inhibition of α‐glucosidase. Analogs synthesized using the Dakin oxidative metho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChemistry & biodiversity Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. e2000906 - n/a
Main Authors Nguyen, Huy Truong, Devi, Asshaima Paramita, Nguyen, Tran‐Van‐Anh, Chavasiri, Warinthorn, Pham, Duc‐Dung, Sichaem, Jirapast, Nguyen, Ngoc‐Hong, Huynh, Bui‐Linh‐Chi, Nguyen, Van‐Kieu, Duong, Thuc Huy
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.04.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study investigated a set of new potential antidiabetes agents. Derivatives of usnic acid were designed and synthesized. These analogs and nineteen benzylidene analogs from a previous study were evaluated for enzyme inhibition of α‐glucosidase. Analogs synthesized using the Dakin oxidative method displayed stronger activity than the pristine usnic acid (IC50>200 μM). Methyl (2E,3R)‐7‐acetyl‐4,6‐dihydroxy‐2‐(2‐methoxy‐2‐oxoethylidene)‐3,5‐dimethyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1‐benzofuran‐3‐carboxylate (6b) and 1,1′‐(2,4,6‐trihydroxy‐5‐methyl‐1,3‐phenylene)di(ethan‐1‐one) (6e) were more potent than an acarbose positive control (IC50 93.6±0.49 μM), with IC50 values of 42.6±1.30 and 90.8±0.32 μM, respectively. Most of the compounds synthesized from the benzylidene series displayed promising activity. (9bR)‐2,6‐Bis[(2E)‐3‐(2‐chlorophenyl)prop‐2‐enoyl]‐3,7,9‐trihydroxy‐8,9b‐dimethyldibenzo[b,d]furan‐1(9bH)‐one (1c), (9bR)‐3,7,9‐trihydroxy‐8,9b‐dimethyl‐2,6‐bis[(2E)‐3‐phenylprop‐2‐enoyl]dibenzo[b,d]furan‐1(9bH)‐one (1g), (9bR)‐2‐acetyl‐6‐[(2E)‐3‐(2‐chlorophenyl)prop‐2‐enoyl]‐3,7,9‐trihydroxy‐8,9b‐dimethyldibenzo[b,d]furan‐1(9bH)‐one (2d), (9bR)‐2‐acetyl‐6‐[(2E)‐3‐(3‐chlorophenyl)prop‐2‐enoyl]‐3,7,9‐trihydroxy‐8,9b‐dimethyldibenzo[b,d]furan‐1(9bH)‐one (2e), (6bR)‐8‐acetyl‐3‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐6,9‐dihydroxy‐5,6b‐dimethyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐[1]benzofuro[2,3‐f][1]benzopyran‐1,7(6bH)‐dione (3e), (6bR)‐8‐acetyl‐6,9‐dihydroxy‐5,6b‐dimethyl‐3‐phenyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐[1]benzofuro[2,3‐f][1]benzopyran‐1,7(6bH)‐dione (3h), (6bR)‐3‐(2‐chlorophenyl)‐8‐[(2E)‐3‐(2‐chlorophenyl)prop‐2‐enoyl]‐6,9‐dihydroxy‐5,6b‐dimethyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐[1]benzofuro[2,3‐f][1]benzopyran‐1,7(6bH)‐dione (4b), and (9bR)‐6‐acetyl‐3,7,9‐trihydroxy‐8,9b‐dimethyl‐2‐[(2E)‐3‐phenylprop‐2‐enoyl]dibenzo[b,d]furan‐1(9bH)‐one (5c) were the most potent α‐glucosidase enzyme inhibitors, with IC50 values of 7.0±0.24, 15.5±0.49, 7.5±0.92, 10.9±0.56, 1.5±0.62, 15.3±0.54, 19.0±1.00, and 12.3±0.53 μM, respectively.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1612-1872
1612-1880
DOI:10.1002/cbdv.202000906