Effect of stand density and humus removal on regeneration of Pinus densiflora seedlings in a mixed conifer and broad-leaved forest

We studied the impact of stand density and forest floor humus removal on regeneration ofPinus densiflora in a mixed co- nifer and broad-leaved forest on the Daimonji-Yama Mountain, Kyoto, Japan. Three levels of stand density were set, i.e., a clear-cut site, a heavily thinned site and a lightly thin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inForestry Studies in China Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 85 - 91
Main Authors Wu, Chu-ping, Ando, Makoto, Zhang, Jun, Shen, Ai-hua, Yuan, Wei-gao, Zhu, Jin-ru, Jiang, Bo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Heidelberg Beijing Forestry University 01.06.2012
Springer Nature B.V
Zhejiang Forestry Academy, Hangzhou 310023, P. R. China%Field Science Education and Research Center, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-oiwake, Kyoto 6068502, Japan
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We studied the impact of stand density and forest floor humus removal on regeneration ofPinus densiflora in a mixed co- nifer and broad-leaved forest on the Daimonji-Yama Mountain, Kyoto, Japan. Three levels of stand density were set, i.e., a clear-cut site, a heavily thinned site and a lightly thinned site. In each density treatment, comparisons were carried out between humus removal (A0-free) and humus intact (A0-intact) subplots. We counted the emergence of sown pine seeds and measured survival and growth of pine seedlings over the next four years. In addition, light conditions and the recovery of understory were monitored. Results show that thinning intensity and humus removal promoted the establishment and growth of seedlings. One exception, however, was that seedling growth was minimal in the heavily thinned A0-intact subplots. This was due to a strong response of understory vegetation growth on the treatment combination, which hindered the pine seedling growth. Furthermore, we found that the canopy openness measured at 1.3-m height remained at least 35% for the heavily thinned site in 2008. The results suggest that the removal of the A0 layer after heavy thinning is the most effective and labor-saving operation for P. densifiora regeneration.
Bibliography:WU Chu-ping, Makoto ANDO, ZHANG Jun, SHEN Ai-hua, YUAN Wei-gao, ZHU Jin-ru, JIANG Bo 1Zhejiang Forestry Academy, Hangzhou 310023, P. R. China 2 Field Science Education and Research Center, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-oiwake, Kyoto 6068502, Japan
11-3919/S
We studied the impact of stand density and forest floor humus removal on regeneration ofPinus densiflora in a mixed co- nifer and broad-leaved forest on the Daimonji-Yama Mountain, Kyoto, Japan. Three levels of stand density were set, i.e., a clear-cut site, a heavily thinned site and a lightly thinned site. In each density treatment, comparisons were carried out between humus removal (A0-free) and humus intact (A0-intact) subplots. We counted the emergence of sown pine seeds and measured survival and growth of pine seedlings over the next four years. In addition, light conditions and the recovery of understory were monitored. Results show that thinning intensity and humus removal promoted the establishment and growth of seedlings. One exception, however, was that seedling growth was minimal in the heavily thinned A0-intact subplots. This was due to a strong response of understory vegetation growth on the treatment combination, which hindered the pine seedling growth. Furthermore, we found that the canopy openness measured at 1.3-m height remained at least 35% for the heavily thinned site in 2008. The results suggest that the removal of the A0 layer after heavy thinning is the most effective and labor-saving operation for P. densifiora regeneration.
Pinus densiflora, regeneration, understory vegetation, thinning, forest operation
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1008-1321
2095-4034
1993-0372
2197-5620
DOI:10.1007/s11632-012-0207-1