Feasibility of Artificial Intelligence-Based Electrocardiography Analysis for the Prediction of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Stable Angina: Validation Study

• Published in: JMIR cardio Vol. 7; p. e44791
• Main Authors: Park, Jiesuck, Yoon, Yeonyee, Cho, Youngjin, Kim, Joonghee
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Canada JMIR Publications 02.05.2023
• Subjects: Acute coronary syndromes; Angina pectoris; Artificial intelligence; Biomarkers; Electrocardiography; Medical imaging; Original Paper; coronary artery disease; AI; coronary stenosis; stable angina; artificial intelligence; electrocardiography
• ISSN: 2561-1011; 2561-1011
• DOI: 10.2196/44791

Despite accumulating research on artificial intelligence-based electrocardiography (ECG) algorithms for predicting acute coronary syndrome (ACS), their application in stable angina is not well evaluated. We evaluated the utility of an existing artificial intelligence-based quantitative electrocardiography (QCG) analyzer in stable angina and developed a new ECG biomarker more suitable for stable angina. This single-center study comprised consecutive patients with stable angina. The independent and incremental value of QCG scores for coronary artery disease (CAD)-related conditions (ACS, myocardial injury, critical status, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and left ventricular dysfunction) for predicting obstructive CAD confirmed by invasive angiography was examined. Additionally, ECG signals extracted by the QCG analyzer were used as input to develop a new QCG score. Among 723 patients with stable angina (median age 68 years; male: 470/723, 65%), 497 (69%) had obstructive CAD. QCG scores for ACS and myocardial injury were independently associated with obstructive CAD (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% CI 1.03-1.17 and OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.16 per 10-point increase, respectively) but did not significantly improve prediction performance compared to clinical features. However, our new QCG score demonstrated better prediction performance for obstructive CAD (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.802) than the original QCG scores, with incremental predictive value in combination with clinical features (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.827 vs 0.730; P<.001). QCG scores developed for acute conditions show limited performance in identifying obstructive CAD in stable angina. However, improvement in the QCG analyzer, through training on comprehensive ECG signals in patients with stable angina, is feasible.