Comparison of feature evaluation criteria for speech recognition based on electromyography

• Published in: Medical & biological engineering & computing Vol. 56; no. 6; pp. 1041 - 1051
• Main Authors: Srisuwan, Niyawadee, Phukpattaranont, Pornchai, Limsakul, Chusak
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.06.2018; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Bayesian analysis; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering; Biomedicine; Classification; Classifiers; Computer Applications; Criteria; Electromyography; Feature recognition; Human Physiology; Imaging; Muscles; Neck; Original Article; Preprocessing; Radiology; Speech; Speech recognition; Feature selection; Electromyography; EMG speech recognition; Feature evaluation
• ISSN: 0140-0118; 1741-0444; 1741-0444
• DOI: 10.1007/s11517-017-1723-x

In this paper, we present a performance comparison of 14 feature evaluation criteria and 4 classifiers for isolated Thai word classification based on electromyography signals (EMG) to find a near-optimal criterion and classifier. Ten subjects spoke 11 Thai number words in both audible and silent modes while the EMG signal from five positions of the facial and neck muscles were captured. After signal collection and preprocessing, 22 EMG features widely used in the EMG recognition field were computed and were then evaluated based on 14 evaluation criteria including both independent criteria (IC) and dependent criteria (DC) for feature evaluation and selection. Subsequently, the top nine features were selected for each criterion, and were used as inputs to classifiers. Four types of classifier were employed with 10-fold cross-validation to estimate classification performance. The results showed that features selected with a DC on a Fisher’s least square linear discriminant classifier (D_FLDA) used with a linear Bayes normal classifier (LBN) gave the best average accuracies, of 93.25 and 80.12% in the audible and the silent modes, respectively.