Postoperative sexual functioning in total versus subtotal laparoscopic hysterectomy: what do women expect?

• Published in: Archives of gynecology and obstetrics Vol. 296; no. 3; pp. 513 - 518
• Main Authors: Berlit, Sebastian, Lis, Stefanie, Jürgens, Sven, Buchweitz, Olaf, Hornemann, Amadeus, Sütterlin, Marc, Tuschy, Benjamin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.09.2017; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Endocrinology; General Gynecology; Gynecology; Human Genetics; Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery; Sexuality; Patient expectations; Laparoscopic hysterectomy; Cervix; Sexuality
• ISSN: 0932-0067; 1432-0711
• DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4452-3

Purpose To evaluate sexual functioning and expected changes in sexual functioning in women with planned total versus subtotal laparoscopic hysterectomy. Methods A total of 120 women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy were preoperatively enrolled in this study with a cross-sectional design. Full data sets were available for 112 patients, so that 56 patients with planned total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and 56 women with planned laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LASH) were preoperatively assessed. Sexual functioning was evaluated using the female sexual function index (FSFI). Additionally, participants filled in a standardised questionnaire concerning expected changes on sexual function after the procedure. Demographic parameters, expectations concerning postoperative sexuality and FSFI scores were analysed and compared in women undergoing TLH and LASH. Results There were no significant differences concerning demographic parameters and FSFI scores comparing collectives. Sexuality in general was considered more important in women undergoing LASH (2.88 ± 0.83 vs. 2.48 ± 0.89; p  = 0.011). Also, in 29 patients (52%) opting for LASH and 8 (14%) patients undergoing TLH a potential change in postoperative sexuality had an impact on their choice for a subtotal/total hysterectomy, respectively ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion Patients’ expectations concerning preservation of the cervix and postoperative sexuality appear to have the potential to bias investigations comparing total with subtotal hysterectomy. Hence, future research focusing on this issue should be accomplished incorporating patients’ expectations stratified by mode of intervention.