Barriers and facilitators to optimising inpatient bladder management after spinal cord injury

• Published in: Spinal cord Vol. 58; no. 12; pp. 1291 - 1300
• Main Authors: Goodes, Louise M., King, Gabrielle K., Goodwin, Denise M., Watts, Anne, Bardsley, Jen, Middleton, James, Bragge, Peter, Dunlop, Sarah A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.12.2020; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: 692/699/375/1824; 692/700/228/491; Anatomy; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Bladder; Disease management; Guidelines; Human Physiology; Neurochemistry; Neuropsychology; Neurosciences; Optimization; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries; Urology
• ISSN: 1362-4393; 1476-5624
• DOI: 10.1038/s41393-020-0487-6

Study design Qualitative survey. Objectives Examine clinicians’ perspectives on adherence to published evidence-based guidelines and clinician-perceived barriers, and facilitators to optimising inpatient bladder management within one Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) service. Setting Surgical Hospital (acute care) and SCI Unit (sub-acute, rehabilitation) in Western Australia (WA). Methods Clinicians reviewed an ‘Evidence Matrix’ summarising published clinical practice guidelines and recommendations for SCI bladder management. Focus groups examined the extent to which current practice adhered to recommendations and identified perceived barriers and facilitators to optimal management. Data were analysed thematically using a deductive approach. Results Current management closely mirrors published recommendations. Key facilitators included long-standing prioritisation of rapid progression from urethral indwelling (IDC) to a 6 hourly intermittent catheterisation (IC) protocol; regular competency audits of catheterisation technique; and a Spinal Urology Clinical Nurse Consultant (CNC) position. Barriers included limited resources/staffing; restricted access to Neuro-urology consultation; inter-disciplinary communication gaps; and delays in determining and implementing long-term bladder management. Conclusions Inpatient SCI bladder care in WA closely emulates published evidence, although adherence at other sites may reveal different practices. Bladder management was found to have been facilitated by a strong culture of practice led by Neuro-urologists, informed by evidence and embraced by Senior Clinicians. Further reduction in duration of initial IDC, provision of early and ongoing Neuro-urology consultations as part of standard care, increased interdisciplinary communication and dedicated SCI Urology theatre lists would further optimise management.