Impact of Paraesophageal Hernia Repair on Respiratory Function: A Systematic Review

Background and Objectives: Surgical repair of hiatal and paraesophageal hernia is widely accepted for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. The respiratory benefit of this surgery is less clear. The objective of this review is to quantify the benefit to pulmonary function and subjective...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in surgery Vol. 8; p. 666686
Main Authors Myers, Dominick, Jacobson, Xander, Dale, Matthew, Sahasranaman, Venket, Nandipati, Kalyana
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 28.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and Objectives: Surgical repair of hiatal and paraesophageal hernia is widely accepted for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. The respiratory benefit of this surgery is less clear. The objective of this review is to quantify the benefit to pulmonary function and subjective dyspnea of paraesophageal hernia repair with the aim of refining the indications and contraindications for elective paraesophageal hernia repair. Methods: Articles were gathered from systematic searches of the Medline Complete Database via the Creighton University Health Sciences Library literature search services. Publications with both pre and postoperative pulmonary function data or both pre and postoperative subjective dyspnea data with regards to surgical paraesophageal hernia repair were included. Results: Six studies were included in this review. The majority of studies in this review show improvement in pulmonary function postoperatively with regards to FEV1, FVC, and VC when stratified by % intrathoracic stomach (ITS), particularly in groups >50% ITS. No significant change was seen in postoperative DLCO or FEV1/FVC. Conclusion: Paraesophageal hernia repair has shown to improve pulmonary function both objectively and subjectively. This review was limited by the paucity of literature on the subject as well as the lack of a standardized method for measurement of %ITS.
Bibliography:content type line 23
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
Edited by: Dirk Weyhe, Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Germany
This article was submitted to Visceral Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery
Reviewed by: Ferdinand Köckerling, Vivantes Hospital, Germany; Stavros Athanasios Antoniou, Mediterranean Hospital of Cyprus, Cyprus
ISSN:2296-875X
2296-875X
DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2021.666686