Plastics and waterbirds in Brazil: A review of ingestion, nest materials and entanglement reveals substantial knowledge gaps and opportunities for research

• Published in: Environmental pollution (1987) Vol. 316; no. Pt 2; p. 120615
• Main Authors: Daudt, Nicholas Winterle, Bugoni, Leandro, Nunes, Guilherme Tavares
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2023
• Subjects: Aquatic birds; aquatic environment; aquatic organisms; Brazil; coasts; Entanglement; indicator species; ingestion; Marine debris; Microplastics; Nests; Pantanal; Plastics; Pollution; rivers; Seabirds; space and time; species; water birds; wetlands; Pantanal; Brazil; Nests; Pollution; Seabirds; Entanglement; Microplastics; Aquatic birds; Plastics; Marine debris
• ISSN: 0269-7491; 1873-6424; 1873-6424
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120615

Plastic pollution is an increasing global problem, especially in aquatic environments. From invertebrates to vertebrates, many aquatic species have been affected by plastic pollution worldwide. Waterbirds also interact with plastics, mainly by ingesting them or using them as nest material. Brazil has one of the largest aquatic environment areas, including the most extensive wetland (the Pantanal) and biggest river (the Amazon), and a ∼7500 km long coastline, which hosts a remarkable waterbird diversity with more than 200 species from 28 bird families. Here, we synthesise published and grey literature to assess where, how, and which waterbirds (marine and continental) interact with plastics in Brazil. We found 96 documents reporting interaction between waterbirds and plastics. Only 32% of the occurring species in the country had at least one individual analysed. Plastic ingestion was reported in 67% of the studies, and seabirds were the study subject in 79% of them. We found no reports in continental aquatic environments, unveiling entire regions without any information regarding interactions. Consequently, this geographic bias drew a considerable taxonomic bias, with whole families and orders without information. Additionally, most studies did not aim to search for plastic interactions, which had a twofold effect. First, studies did not report their findings using the proposed standard metrics, hampering thus advances in understanding trends or defining robust baselines. Second, as it was not their main objective, plastics were not mentioned in titles, abstracts, and keywords, making it difficult to find these studies. We propose means for achieving a better understanding of waterbird-plastic interactions in space and time, and recommend searching for sentinel species and for allocating research grants. [Display omitted] •Waterbird-plastic interactions are poorly studied in Brazil.•Most studies were with marine birds (79%) and reported plastic ingestion (67%).•Procellariiformes was the most studied taxon, followed by Sphenisciformes and Charadriiformes.•Little information exists for entire regions (including the Amazon), whole orders and families.•Studies do not use standard metrics, hampering advances in the topic.