EBSD study of a hot deformed austenitic stainless steel

► Microstructural characterization of an austenitic stainless steel by EBSD. ► The role of twins in the nucleation and growth of dynamic recrystallization. ► Grain refinement through the discontinuous dynamic recrystallization. ► Determination of recrystallized fraction using the grain average misor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMaterials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing Vol. 538; pp. 236 - 245
Main Authors Mirzadeh, H., Cabrera, J.M., Najafizadeh, A., Calvillo, P.R.
Format Journal Article Publication
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier B.V 15.03.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► Microstructural characterization of an austenitic stainless steel by EBSD. ► The role of twins in the nucleation and growth of dynamic recrystallization. ► Grain refinement through the discontinuous dynamic recrystallization. ► Determination of recrystallized fraction using the grain average misorientation. ► Relationship between recrystallization and the frequency of high angle boundaries. The microstructural evolution of a 304 H austenitic stainless steel subjected to hot compression was studied by the electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) technique. Detailed data about the boundaries, coincidence site lattice (CSL) relationships and grain size were acquired from the orientation imaging microscopy (OIM) maps. It was found that twins play an important role in the nucleation and growth of dynamic recrystallization (DRX) during hot deformation. Moreover, the conventional discontinuous DRX (DDRX) was found to be in charge of grain refinement reached under the testing conditions studied. Furthermore, the recrystallized fraction (X) was determined from the grain average misorientation (GAM) distribution based on the threshold value of 1.55°. The frequency of high angle boundaries showed a direct relationship with X. A time exponent of 1.11 was determined from Avrami analysis, which was related to the observed single-peak behavior in the stress–strain flow curves.
ISSN:0921-5093
1873-4936
DOI:10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.037