Conservative treatment for lumbar compartment syndrome shows efficacy over 2-year follow-up: a case report and literature review

Background Since in all studies of conservative treatment of lumbar compartment syndrome the follow-up duration was less than 6 months, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions. Purpose To report a patient with lumbar paraspinal compartment syndrome who was treated conservatively over a follow-up pe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery Vol. 137; no. 9; pp. 1233 - 1238
Main Authors Kanaya, Haruhisa, Enokida, Makoto, Tanishima, Shinji, Hayashi, Ikuta, Tanida, Atsushi, Nagashima, Hideki
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.09.2017
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Since in all studies of conservative treatment of lumbar compartment syndrome the follow-up duration was less than 6 months, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions. Purpose To report a patient with lumbar paraspinal compartment syndrome who was treated conservatively over a follow-up period of 2 years. Study design This is a case report of a 23-year-old male college student with lumbar paraspinal compartment syndrome who was treated conservatively. Methods We report a case of a 23-year-old male college student with lumbar paraspinal compartment syndrome who was treated conservatively. We repeatedly checked his physical examination, laboratory tests, lumbar compartment pressures, and magnetic resonance imaging, and surgical teams were readily prepared to operate should the patient’s condition worsen. To prevent complications of rhabdomyolysis, hydration and alkalization were performed. We followed him up to 2 years after discharge. Result Although the temporal changes on MRI up to the 1-year point, the patient continued to have no symptoms. Conclusions Conservative therapy can be recommended if rhabdomyolysis is under control.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0936-8051
1434-3916
DOI:10.1007/s00402-017-2732-9