The effect of stress triaxiality on the phase transformation in transformation induced plasticity steels: Experimental investigation and modelling the transformation kinetics

In situ multiaxial loading during neutron diffraction tests were undertaken on a low-alloyed Quenched and Partitioning (Q&P) Transformation Induced Plasticity (TRIP) Bainitic Ferrite (TBF) steel with dispersed austenite particles. The effect of stress triaxiality on the evolution of the deformat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMaterials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing Vol. 800; p. 140321
Main Authors Polatidis, E., Haidemenopoulos, G.N., Krizan, D., Aravas, N., Panzner, T., Šmíd, M., Papadioti, I., Casati, N., Van Petegem, S., Van Swygenhoven, H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Lausanne Elsevier B.V 07.01.2021
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In situ multiaxial loading during neutron diffraction tests were undertaken on a low-alloyed Quenched and Partitioning (Q&P) Transformation Induced Plasticity (TRIP) Bainitic Ferrite (TBF) steel with dispersed austenite particles. The effect of stress triaxiality on the evolution of the deformation-induced martensite is investigated under uniaxial- and equibiaxial-tension as well as tension/compression with a ratio of −1:6. It is shown that transformation is not a monotonic function of stress triaxiality; the amount of deformation-induced martensite is similar under uniaxial and equibiaxial tension but it is significantly smaller under tension/compression. The transformation kinetics are modeled using a recently developed kinetic model that accounts for the stress state and the stability and size of the austenite particles. The larger austenite particles transform first and the mean volume of the austenite particles decreases with increasing strain; the decreasing austenite particle size impedes the phase transformation as the deformation proceeds. It is concluded that stress triaxiality alone cannot account for the differences in the transformation kinetics between different loading states and that the number of potential nucleation sites depends on the stress state.
ISSN:0921-5093
1873-4936
DOI:10.1016/j.msea.2020.140321