Do Vision and Language Models Share Concepts? A Vector Space Alignment Study
Large-scale pretrained language models (LMs) are said to “lack the ability to connect utterances to the world” (Bender and Koller, ), because they do not have “mental models of the world” (Mitchell and Krakauer, ). If so, one would expect LM representations to be unrelated to representations induced...
Saved in:
Published in | Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics Vol. 12; pp. 1232 - 1249 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
255 Main Street, 9th Floor, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
MIT Press
30.09.2024
The MIT Press |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2307-387X 2307-387X |
DOI | 10.1162/tacl_a_00698 |
Cover
Summary: | Large-scale pretrained language models (LMs) are said to “lack the ability to connect utterances to the world” (Bender and Koller,
), because they do not have “mental models of the world” (Mitchell and Krakauer,
). If so, one would expect LM representations to be unrelated to representations induced by vision models. We present an empirical evaluation across four families of LMs (BERT, GPT-2, OPT, and LLaMA-2) and three vision model architectures (ResNet, SegFormer, and MAE). Our experiments show that LMs partially converge towards representations isomorphic to those of vision models, subject to dispersion, polysemy, and frequency. This has important implications for
multi-modal processing and the LM understanding debate (Mitchell and Krakauer,
). |
---|---|
Bibliography: | 2024 |
ISSN: | 2307-387X 2307-387X |
DOI: | 10.1162/tacl_a_00698 |