New Classification for Correction of Alar Retraction Using the Alar Spreader Graft

• Published in: Aesthetic plastic surgery Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 832 - 841
• Main Authors: Kim, Jae Hoon, Park, Sung Wan, Oh, Won Suk, Lee, Joo Heon
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer-Verlag 01.08.2012; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adult; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hyaline Cartilage - surgery; Hyaline Cartilage - transplantation; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Nasal Septum - surgery; Original Article; Otorhinolaryngology; Patient Satisfaction; Plastic Surgery; Republic of Korea; Rhinoplasty - classification; Rhinoplasty - methods; Surgical Flaps; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult; Republic of Korea; Alar spreader graft; Alar retraction; Classification; Nasal hinge
• ISSN: 0364-216X; 1432-5241
• DOI: 10.1007/s00266-012-9901-6

Background Identifying the cause of alar retraction is essential for proper correction of this deformity. In secondary surgery, aimed primarily at cephalic orientation and medialization of the lateral crus, corrections involving spreading and lateralization of the lateral crus can achieve a more horizontal orientation. In their clinic, the authors have practiced the use of an alar spreader graft to support the spread of the lateral crus. For the lateral crus to move freely without any resistance, it is critical to release the nasal hinge and pyriform ligament. A frontal view of the alar notching and the direction of the lateral crus are highly important factors needed to determine the cause of alar retraction. This report describes a new classification system for alar retractions viewed from the front to aid in determining the cause of the retraction and the surgical management. Methods From March 2008 to July 2010, 31 alar retractions were corrected using alar spreader grafts for patients showing clear alar retractions in frontal views. Results Satisfactory results without severe complications were obtained in 30 cases, with undercorrection in only 1 case. The alar cartilage was completely released to facilitate lateralization and caudal mobilization. An alar spreader graft then was used to support the lateral crus until a biologic scar cast was formed. Conclusion The use of alar spreader grafts to correct alar retractions provided consistently good results. The attempt also was made to enhance the treatment strategy based on this classification system derived from frontal views of alar retraction. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors at www.springer.com/00266 .