Timing in a dual-task in children and adults: when the interference effect is higher with concurrent non-temporal than temporal information

This study used a dual task with participants of different levels of cognitive capacities, assessed with neuropsychological tests, to examine the attentional cost on time judgment of processing concurrent temporal and non-temporal information. Children and adults performed a temporal reproduction ta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cognitive psychology (Hove, England) Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 34 - 48
Main Authors Hallez, Q., Droit-Volet, S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hove Routledge 02.01.2019
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Taylor & Francis edition
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study used a dual task with participants of different levels of cognitive capacities, assessed with neuropsychological tests, to examine the attentional cost on time judgment of processing concurrent temporal and non-temporal information. Children and adults performed a temporal reproduction task with either an interfering temporal or non-temporal discrimination task. The results showed an underestimation of time in the dual task compared to the single task, the extent of which was directly linked to individual attentional capacities. However, the non-temporal task interfered more than the temporal task on the reproduced durations. Nonetheless, the temporal reproduction task equally affected performance in the non-temporal and the temporal discrimination task. These results reveal the predominant role of the cost of dual-tasking in interference effects on time judgment, and the lesser role of concurrent information, especially of temporal information. This suggests a lack of competition for attentional resources in the processing of multiple durations.
ISSN:2044-5911
2044-592X
DOI:10.1080/20445911.2019.1567519